Some examples and use cases from the internet:

Some examples and use cases from the internet:

• Unreasoned (or implicit) rejection of the applicant's request that witnesses be examined.
• According to the applicants, the Commission therefore violated the applicant's legitimate expectations.
• The period of eligibility must correspond to the applicant's budget year.
• order the CoR to resume, from the date of the future judgment, the transfer of part of the applicant's remuneration to France, with the correction coefficient applicable to that country;
• Annulment of the applicant's appraisal report for 2008.
• Finally, the contested decisions undermine the applicant's professional reputation and dignity.
• In the applicant's submission, the regulation has no legal basis in Community law.
• Decision to remove the applicant's personal effects

• It is the applicants' responsibility to send their complete application by the deadline.
• These procedural failings harmed, in the applicants' view, their rights of defence.
• Application for annulment of the applicants' pay slips for January 2009.
• In the applicants' opinion, that breaches the principle of individual responsibility.
• Driving examiners must be trained to assess correctly the applicants' ability to drive safely.
• Applicants' rights unprotected as no procedural guarantees must be respected in the original text.
• Applicants' rights unprotected as no procedural guarantees must be respected in the original text.
• In the applicants' opinion this constitutes a procedural defect in violation of the Treaty.