Some examples and use cases from the internet:

Some examples and use cases from the internet:

• In my reply to Parliament and in view of the fact that Parliament deserves to have the opinion of the Commission on all the amendments which have been tabled, I see that I have been speaking for 24 minutes.
• In March, we issued an unambiguous position on clones, and now we have the opinion of the group of advisers, and the difference between the two is very striking.
• If new elements are brought to our attention, obviously we need to have the opinion of the organizing committee as well.
• Before giving my opinion, I would therefore particularly like to have the opinion of the Chairman of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs.
• I do not think that we have the opinion of the Committee on the Regions yet on these general provisions concerning the Structural Funds.
• It would be very interesting for all of us to have the opinion of the Commission specifically on those.
• I have the opinion that life has taught me.
• A moment ago, you postponed a report because we did not have the opinion of the Committee on the Regions.

• At any rate, I am sure that Member States will be of the opinion that the position must be scrupulously fair and equal for all possible applicants.
• However, the Commission seems to be of the opinion that the financial reference for the "third countries" regulation would be agreed within the meaning of article 34 of the IIA (not binding).
• I just happen to be of the opinion that trials are about truth.
• Furthermore, the Commission continues to be of the opinion that a development of incentive schemes and/or funding for the relocation of establishments is a task for Member States
• this is subsidiarity.
• Not all are pleased about this, and some may even be of the opinion that we do far too much in this field.
• The Commission appears to be of the opinion that this matter belongs in Community and national patent legislation, but that is insufficient.
• Some of you seem to be of the opinion that this agreement is unbalanced and skewed in favour of United States stakeholders.