Some examples and use cases from the internet:

Some examples and use cases from the internet:

• In the replies to the questions below, information shall only be given on the changes made by Member States in order to implement the provisions of Directive 2010/75/EU mentioned in its Article 80(1).
• The screenshot below shows the reply we distributed by email.
• The application of one company (company 2 in table below) was rejected on the basis of a first analysis of the reply to the MET claim form which failed to show that all the criteria were met.
• The reply provided was verified as detailed below.
• However, the reply also revealed that it is not a matter of an outsourcing arrangement where the ownership of the raw material and the finished goods stay with the company giving the outsourcing order, but goes beyond for the reasons stated below.
• On the basis of the replies to the questionnaire sent to the Member States, it was possible to obtain a picture of national practices in this field, which are presented below in the form of a table.
• Thread list of message headers will put all the messages in the header pane in a kind of tree list, so that the replies to a message are directly below that message.
• Despite the fact that the information regarding sales volumes in the replies was considered to be unreliable as explained in recital 29 below, it is considered that this still gives an indication that cooperation was high and that the companies investigated are representative.

• However, the reply also revealed that it is not a matter of an outsourcing arrangement where the ownership of the raw material and the finished goods stay with the company giving the outsourcing order, but goes beyond for the reasons stated below.
• The screenshot below shows the reply we distributed by email.
• On the basis of the replies to the questionnaire sent to the Member States, it was possible to obtain a picture of national practices in this field, which are presented below in the form of a table.
• The application of one company (company 2 in table below) was rejected on the basis of a first analysis of the reply to the MET claim form which failed to show that all the criteria were met.
• Despite the fact that the information regarding sales volumes in the replies was considered to be unreliable as explained in recital 29 below, it is considered that this still gives an indication that cooperation was high and that the companies investigated are representative.
• In the replies to the questions below, information shall only be given on the changes made by Member States in order to implement the provisions of Directive 2010/75/EU mentioned in its Article 80(1).
• Thread list of message headers will put all the messages in the header pane in a kind of tree list, so that the replies to a message are directly below that message.
• The reply provided was verified as detailed below.