Cannot be considered as a vs cannot be considered to be a

Check any text for mistakes in above text box. Grammar Check your text.

Plagiarism Checker - Best Grammar and Plagiarism Checker for Students, Teachers

Looking on the internet deeply has found these results:

cannot be considered as a is the most popular phrase on the web. 

cannot be considered to be a

159,800,000 results on the web

cannot be considered as a

164,100,000 results on the web

More popular!

Some examples and use cases from the internet:

Some examples and use cases from the internet:

  • In the light of the considerations made at recitals (97) to (106), the Commission concludes that the Houses Contract cannot be considered to be a normal market operation.
  • Given this degree of GOK control over Pusan Bank, the bank's decision to participate in the syndicated loan cannot be considered to be a safe commercial benchmark.
  • Since from the design of the article it cannot be deducted which purpose it would serve, this article cannot be considered to be a 'similar container' within the meaning of heading 4202.
  • Since the scheme does not apply to all economic operators, it cannot be considered to be a general tax policy measure.
  • (24) According to Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation, when constructing normal value, a reasonable amount for profits should be added. Therefore, a nil profit cannot be considered to be a cap.
  • The product cannot be considered to be a splint or other fracture appliance as it is not used to immobilise part of the body following a fracture.
  • Customers, likewise, cannot be considered to be a position to prevent coordination on supply by the two parties.
  • The investment project cannot be considered to be a SIP because the fixed assets of the investment would be 'economically divisible' within the meaning of paragraph 60 of the RAG.
  • The investigation revealed that stocks cannot be considered as a meaningful injury factor since the vast majority of production is made in response to orders.
  • The Commission notes that the legislative decree in question cannot be considered as a valid system of reference.
  • Because of the size it cannot be considered as a prefabricated building of heading 9406.
  • Inventories cannot be considered as a relevant injury indicator in this sector, as production and sales are mainly based on orders and, accordingly, producers tend to hold limited stocks.
  • Consequently, the DFRC cannot be considered as a substitution drawback scheme in accordance with the basic Regulation(3).
  • Therefore, the economic downturn cannot be considered as a possible cause breaching the causal link between the threat of injury and the dumped Chinese imports.
  • Consequently, the granular PTFE market cannot be considered as a shrinking market.
  • The Commission therefore concludes that this prolonged maturity cannot be considered as a contribution to restructuring from external resources.

Related Comparison