Some examples and use cases from the internet:

Some examples and use cases from the internet:

• Without a common understanding, national implementing rules could lead to Member States applying the requirements in different ways which compounds the difficulties for manufacturers and railway undertakings.
• I do not agree, however, with the co
• It says literally that "a more intense trade in goods and services between the Member States could lead to additional risks to the consumer".
• In this context, a comparison between States could lead to the use of best practices.
• Strict interpretation by an implementing Member State could lead to a number of what can only be best described as 'consumer protection warnings'.
• financing percentages proposed in certain amendments, because they could lead some Member States to limit their participation in the programme.
• This pressure on the budgets of Member States could lead to difficulties in the financing of social security.
• Unilateral measures by Member States could lead to differing levels of protection, and also hinder trade in plant protection products.

• Participation in the initial collective action could result in some Member States reducing their security oil stocks below the compulsory minimum levels laid down by Directive 68/414/EEC.
• financing.
• We are opposed to the full application of the n+2 rule to the Cohesion Fund, as in our opinion this could result in the new Member States losing out on substantial amounts of cohesion funding.
• A second doubt raised by the Commission was whether the change in the designated use of the land swapped could result in the grant of State aid, as it further increased the value of the land swapped.
• This could result in the Member States refusing to cooperate, or partly avoiding cooperation, with national co
• It will not assist in getting products to the market more quickly and at worst could result in Member States being unable to respond to an outbreak of a rare disease.
• (5) Participation in the initial collective action could result in some Member States reducing their security oil stocks below the compulsory minimum levels laid down by Directive 68/414/EEC.
• It will not assist in getting products to the market more quickly and at worst could result in Member States being unable to respond to an outbreak of a rare disease.