Looking on the internet deeply has found these results:

faux fur garment is the most popular phrase on the web.

synthetic fur garment 110,500 results on the web	faux fur garment 159,800 results on the web More popular!
Some examples and use cases from the internet:	Some examples and use cases from the internet:
Russeks has been the biggest buyer of pelts, and producers of fur garments in the world,	And of course it will all be faux fur. Such furs, dyed to appear like faux fur, have been found for sale on garments in shops and stores within the EU. Such furs, dyed to appear like faux fur, have been found for sale on garments in shops and stores within the EU. A labelling requirement would not be suitable to achieve the same result since it would disproportionately burden the garment trade in general, including even traders who specialise in faux fur and would also be disproportionately costly. A labelling requirement would not be suitable to achieve the same result since it would disproportionately burden the garment trade in general, including traders who specialise in faux fur, and would also be disproportionately costly. It's a faux fur, Sam. A labelling requirement would be routinely contravened, ignored or manipulated by unscrupulous traders to subvert any such requirement and in any case, would impose a disproportionate cost upon the entire garment industry, including those who only ever use faux fur. How do we stand with exotic faux furs.

synthetic fur garment

110,500 results on the web

faux fur garment

159,800 results on the web

More popular!

Russeks has been the biggest buyer of pelts, and producers of fur garments in the world,

And of course it will all be faux fur.
Such furs, dyed to appear like faux fur, have been found for sale on garments in shops and stores within the EU.
Such furs, dyed to appear like faux fur, have been found for sale on garments in shops and stores within the EU.
A labelling requirement would not be suitable to achieve the same result since it would disproportionately burden the garment trade in general, including even traders who specialise in faux fur and would also be disproportionately costly.
A labelling requirement would not be suitable to achieve the same result since it would disproportionately burden the garment trade in general, including traders who specialise in faux fur, and would also be disproportionately costly.
It's a faux fur, Sam.
A labelling requirement would be routinely contravened, ignored or manipulated by unscrupulous traders to subvert any such requirement and in any case, would impose a disproportionate cost upon the entire garment industry, including those who only ever use faux fur.
How do we stand with exotic faux furs.