Impose costs to vs impose costs for

Check any text for mistakes in above text box. Grammar Check your text.

Plagiarism Checker - Best Grammar and Plagiarism Checker for Students, Teachers

Looking on the internet deeply has found these results:

impose costs to is the most popular phrase on the web. 

impose costs for

162,200 results on the web

impose costs to

169,100 results on the web

More popular!

Some examples and use cases from the internet:

Some examples and use cases from the internet:

  • The competent authority or authorities, which carry out official controls, may impose costs or penalties for the person responsible for any personal consignment that is found to be in breach of the rules laid down in this Regulation.
  • Such problems have serious impacts on health and impose direct economic costs for society; estimates for China are in the order of 7% of its GDP.
  • The EESC questions the proposal to go beyond IAS 24 that is likely to impose significant additional costs for many non
  • level data which are discriminatory or give rise to undue restrictions on access to loan
  • Rules impose costs and constraints that are a burden on the work of businesses and intermediaries.
  • may not impose costs for data users for the supply or extraction of loan
  • level data.
  • listed companies which would outweigh the benefits to users of their financial statements.
  • Considering that it would increase the administrative burden and impose additional costs to the industry, the Council cannot support the main element of amendment 6 which calls for a mandatory system of certification.
  • The Commission characterises the various obstacles to rolling stock
  • The document actually explicitly states, several times, that it is impossible for the legislators to impose cost
  • It is important to recognise that regulation imposes costs and barriers to entry and can therefore itself serve to restrict competition and innovation.
  • The Italian environmental legislation, furthermore, imposes additional costs amounting to about EUR 8 million per year.
  • acceptance of technical, procedural or political nature which impose costs to railway undertakings and manufacturers when placing rolling stock in service.
  • It was not the job of the EU to impose costs and burdens on the need for free transport of animals.
  • free status under these circumstances.

Related Comparison