Some examples and use cases from the internet:

Some examples and use cases from the internet:

• The Member States may raise the limit laid down in paragraph 1 to a maximum of 35 %.
• Without prejudice to the limits laid down in Article 25, the Member States may raise the limits laid down in Article 22 to a maximum of
• Unfortunately, these endeavours will now be to no avail if, at the same time, the EU intends to raise the limit values for noxious heavy metals in fish.
• I am, however, prepared to raise the limit on subventions to the 70% permissible under the Commission's established financial rules, but I cannot go beyond this.
• We prefer the original proposal which makes it possible in certain circumstances to raise the limit to 100 employees.
• Note that the problem is made even more serious by Article 35 of the loi de finances rectificative pour 2000, which raises the limit to FRF 5 million.
• The Protocol introduces compulsory insurance to cover passengers on ships and raises the limits of liability.
• Any objection to raise the limit, say £500?

• whereas efforts to increase the limits of liability imposed in the Warsaw Convention should continue through negotiation at multilateral level;
• In this sense, I believe it is appropriate to increase the limit for objective liability proposed by the Commission from ECU 100000 to ECU 120000.
• 2. The Member States may authorise the contracting parties to increase the limit fixed in Article 2(2) by a maximum of 15 % for each of the products concerned.
• I therefore find it worrying that there is now a desire to increase the limit values.
• Until 31 December 1998, Member States may increase the limit laid down in Article 49(1) to 40 % and the limit laid down in Article 49(2) to 30 %.
• The modification envisaged will result in an overall increase of the limits for airborne and liquid effluent discharges in order to allow for tritium and carbon 14.
• Seen against this background, the common position represents a very significant increase in the limit value.
• Firstly, we want it spelt out even more clearly that in five years' time, after the review, moves will be made to increase the limit values; we want this laid down now along with the eight decibels.