Some examples and use cases from the internet:

Some examples and use cases from the internet:

• According to Hungarian law [20], if a guarantor has to satisfy claims from a guarantee, all the rights pertaining to the underlying loan are transferred to him.
• This amount would have been first used to satisfy the claims with a right to separate satisfaction, leaving free insolvency assets of only EUR [0
• Thus, if Nitrogénm?vek fails to repay the loans and MFB calls the guarantee, the State can satisfy its claims from the pledges under the loan agreement.
• The proceeds from the sale of the secured assets in the bankruptcy procedure are meant to be used exclusively to satisfy the claims of the separate creditors.
• 5] million.
• Gewährträgerhaftung is a default guarantee offered to creditors in the event that the bank's assets are no longer sufficient to satisfy their claims, and this is not the case here.
• Gewährträgerhaftung is a default guarantee offered to creditors in the event that the bank's assets are not sufficient to satisfy their claims, and this is not the case here.
• to satisfy claims against the owners under the settlement in the Refco matter,

• 5] million.
• Gewährträgerhaftung is a default guarantee offered to creditors in the event that the bank's assets are not sufficient to satisfy their claims, and this is not the case here.
• The proceeds from the sale of the secured assets in the bankruptcy procedure are meant to be used exclusively to satisfy the claims of the separate creditors.
• Thus, if Nitrogénm?vek fails to repay the loans and MFB calls the guarantee, the State can satisfy its claims from the pledges under the loan agreement.
• According to Hungarian law [20], if a guarantor has to satisfy claims from a guarantee, all the rights pertaining to the underlying loan are transferred to him.
• This amount would have been first used to satisfy the claims with a right to separate satisfaction, leaving free insolvency assets of only EUR [0
• Gewährträgerhaftung is a default guarantee offered to creditors in the event that the bank's assets are no longer sufficient to satisfy their claims, and this is not the case here.
• to satisfy claims against the owners under the settlement in the Refco matter,