Were positive for vs tested positive for

Check any text for mistakes in above text box. Grammar Check your text.

Plagiarism Checker - Best Grammar and Plagiarism Checker for Students, Teachers

Looking on the internet deeply has found these results:

were positive for is the most popular phrase on the web. 

tested positive for

17,510,000 results on the web

were positive for

19,560,000 results on the web

More popular!

Some examples and use cases from the internet:

Some examples and use cases from the internet:

  • One of them tested positive for meningitis.
  • Patient tested positive for syphilis, right?
  • Because you have tested positive for syphilis.
  • You have tested positive for chlamydia.
  • I'm afraid that you have tested positive for chlamydia, syphilis, gonorrhea, hepatitis, pancreatitis, trichomonitis, nongonococcal urethritis.
  • The congressman tested positive for the same strain of chlamydia as the victim.
  • But she tested positive for pseudoephedrine.
  • I'm afraid you've tested positive for malignancy.
  • (7) If any of the results were positive for the serotypes below during the life of the flock, indicate as positive:
  • (6) If any of the results were positive for the following serotypes during the life of the parent flock, indicate as positive: Salmonella Infantis, Salmonella Virchow and Salmonella Hadar.
  • Already in 2006 the operating results (EBIT) of FBS were positive for the first time.
  • Scientists compared 337 subjects involved in accidents, of whom 161 were positive for alcohol and/or other drugs, with 2726 randomly selected drivers, of whom 301 were positive for alcohol and/or other drugs.
  • Among the 13 regular smokers, all breath samples were positive for THC at 0.89 h, 76.9% at 1.38 h, and 53.8% at 2.38 h, and only 1 sample was positive at 4.2 h after smoking.
  • 52/ 54 patients (96%) treated with Naglazyme across studies were positive for antibodies to galsulfase.
  • Only 9% of cats with FIP were positive for FeLV, which confirms the downward trend of the two diseases simultaneously than ever before. Compared to IVF is no cat in this study tested positive.
  • Study WV16240 recruited patients who were positive for HBeAg, while study WV16241 recruited patients who were negative for HBeAg and positive for anti

Related Comparison