In peer review vs under peer review

Check any text for mistakes in above text box. Grammar Check your text.

Plagiarism Checker - Best Grammar and Plagiarism Checker for Students, Teachers

Looking on the internet deeply has found these results:

in peer review is the most popular phrase on the web. 

under peer review

131,700 results on the web

in peer review

1396,000 results on the web

More popular!

Some examples and use cases from the internet:

Some examples and use cases from the internet:

  • The use of the handbook should be considered as a significant element in the assessment of the convergence of supervisory practices and for the peer review under Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.
  • assessments have been carried out in Member States in close connection with international peer reviews under the auspices of the IAEA as International Regulatory Review Team or Integrated Regulatory Review Service missions.
  • I think his department should be under peer review.
  • In the past, self
  • As regards the peer review under the auspices of the Council, the European Union will send an expert mission to Bulgaria as soon as possible, before the conclusion of the accession negotiations.
  • The scope of such peer reviews shall include corporate governance practices under paragraph 7a.
  • Under evidence code 1157, peer review conference transcripts are inadmissible.
  • Depending on whether a substance is already under peer review or not, for certain aspects of the procedure, different provisions should apply.
  • Calls on the Commission to increase the number of women involved in peer review exercises, since this will familiarise women with Union procedures and programmes and encourage direct applications from them;
  • Experts shall not participate in peer reviews in the Member State where they are employed.
  • As a doctor I know that advances in medicine are often achieved only after rigorous scrutiny and challenge in peer review journals.
  • Experts shall not participate in peer reviews in the Member State where they are employed.
  • The exchange can take place in peer reviews with a limited number of participants focusing on a specific theme, or in conferences with wider discussions.
  • Since accreditation bodies must actively demonstrate that the trust they enjoy is well placed, the EESC thinks they should have to prove that they participate successfully in peer review.
  • The Commission must ensure that social partners and other relevant civil society organisations are involved in peer reviews.
  • Carbon dating results don't get published in peer review journals.

Related Comparison