Cannot be considered as a vs cannot be considered to be

Check any text for mistakes in above text box. Grammar Check your text.

Plagiarism Checker - Best Grammar and Plagiarism Checker for Students, Teachers

Looking on the internet deeply has found these results:

cannot be considered as a is the most popular phrase on the web. 

cannot be considered to be

129,800,000 results on the web

cannot be considered as a

164,100,000 results on the web

More popular!

Some examples and use cases from the internet:

Some examples and use cases from the internet:

  • As a result, if one of the conditions is not fulfilled then the relevant measure cannot be considered to be State aid.
  • competitive effects resulting from the State aid involved cannot be considered to be significant.
  • (66) As concerns the impact on the Community industry of the magnitude of the actual margins of dumping, given the volume and the prices of the imports from the country concerned, this impact cannot be considered to be negligible.
  • In this sense, I believe that by eliminating subjective factors such as personal happiness, which cannot be considered to be indicators, the new text has reached a good compromise.
  • Accordingly, criterion 1 cannot be considered to be met.
  • Consequently, they consider that the anti
  • Given this degree of GOK control over Pusan Bank, the bank's decision to participate in the syndicated loan cannot be considered to be a safe commercial benchmark.
  • Given that cooperation from the PRC was very low as stated in recitals 22 and 24, the findings for the cooperating companies cannot be considered to be representative for the country.
  • Therefore, the economic downturn cannot be considered as a possible cause breaching the causal link between the threat of injury and the dumped Chinese imports.
  • Consequently, the granular PTFE market cannot be considered as a shrinking market.
  • Inventories cannot be considered as a relevant injury indicator in this sector, as production and sales are mainly based on orders and, accordingly, producers tend to hold limited stocks.
  • The Commission notes that the legislative decree in question cannot be considered as a valid system of reference.
  • Because of the size it cannot be considered as a prefabricated building of heading 9406.
  • The investigation revealed that stocks cannot be considered as a meaningful injury factor since the vast majority of production is made in response to orders.
  • The Commission therefore concludes that this prolonged maturity cannot be considered as a contribution to restructuring from external resources.
  • Consequently, the DFRC cannot be considered as a substitution drawback scheme in accordance with the basic Regulation(3).

Related Comparison