G
Grammar Checker
Grammar & Writing Guide

costs for vs costs of

costs for vs costs of which is much better to use in a sentence. Which is more popular in English form?

Looking on the internet deeply has found these results:

costs for is the most popular phrase on the web.

costs of

182,500,000 results on the web

costs for

1189,000,000 results on the web

More popular!

Some examples and use cases from the internet:

Some examples and use cases from the internet:

  • T transmission out of the licence fee income accruing to them.
  • Leon were eligible.
  • The costs of acquiring unused fixed assets located in the region of Castile
  • The costs of these checks shall be paid by the slaughterhouse concerned.
  • The costs of such verification shall be borne by the operators subject to it.
  • The PSBs finance the costs of DVB
  • The Competent authority shall recover the costs of such action in the appropriate manner.
  • Where appropriate, the costs of manufacturing and SG&A expenses as verified were used in constructing normal values.
  • Included are the costs for all employees including homeworkers and apprentices.
  • costs for architects, engineers, consultants and feasibility studies,
  • This appropriation is intended to cover costs for catering and meals served during meetings.
  • Were the costs for the administration of the vaccines included, this amount could easily double.
  • Reports have shown an increase in costs for decommissioning.
  • Our costs for security policy are running almost according to the time frame.
  • It does not reflect the real costs for maintenance of the bridge.
  • The costs for digitisation are public service costs.

Related Comparison

Want to check your own writing right now?

Paste your text into our 100% free multi-tool workspace.

Open Grammar Checker
QuillBot-Grade Writing Suite

Upgrade to Grammarchecker.io Premium

Unlock 10 AI rewriting modes, unlimited word paraphrasing, executive fluency feedback, and deep plagiarism checking.

Upgrade to Premium