Some examples and use cases from the internet:

Some examples and use cases from the internet:

• For this purpose, an additional amount of 16 % of the value of sales was considered appropriate.
• Regarding this argument, it should be noted that during the review investigation period no VAT on export sales was refunded.
• Furthermore, evidence of State influence on the company's decisions with regard to export sales was established on spot.
• In 2012 a profit of +2,5 % on the related sales was made.
• The ban on parallel sales was introduced to avoid compensatory deals that might undermine the undertaking.
• The decrease in the euro value of this holding due to these sales was partially compensated by a significant rise in the price of gold during 2006 (see «Gold and foreign currency assets and liabilities» in the notes on accounting policies).
• The investigation has established that the VAT paid on export sales was not refunded.
• A substantial part of these sales was carried out at prices below the MIP.

• In this case, the level of trade adjustment was significant as virtually all sales were done via traders/distributors in the Community.
• These sales were compared to the constructed normal value as calculated above, taking into account differences which affect price comparability.
• Calculations have shown the possibility that these sales were at dumped prices.
• Again, these sales were excluded from the calculation.
• Firstly, these sales were isolated from the sales to unrelated parties.
• However, this claim was rejected as it was not considered appropriate to include an inland freight cost allowance for return freight costs where the sales were partially or totally cancelled.
• These sales were therefore excluded from the calculation.
• The Chinese producer criticised the fact that some sales were excluded from the dumping calculation.